Home About Contact Biblio-Blog Subscribe
Advanced Search
Shopping
Catalogues
Wildlife Equipment

 Bat Detectors
 Nest Boxes

Wildlife DVDs
Special Offers
Distribution

 Trade Catalogue

Library Services
Help

 Print an Order Form
 Email Us

Browse by Subject
Browse by Geozone
Contact:

Tel: +44 (0)1803 865913
Fax: +44 (0)1803 865280

email: customer.services
@nhbs.co.uk


2-3 Wills Road, Totnes, Devon TQ9 5XN, UK

Title information

Structures of Scientific Collaboration


Wesley Shrum, Joel Genuth and Ivan Chompalov
280 pages, figs.
MIT Press
 
Hardcover | 2007 | £22.95 | approx. $46/€30

#168492 | ISBN-13: 9780262195591
Collaboration among organizations is rapidly becoming common in scientific research as globalization and new communication technologies make it possible for researchers from different locations and institutions to work together on common projects. These scientific and technological collaborations are part of a general trend toward more fluid, flexible, and temporary organizational arrangements, but they have received very limited scholarly attention.

Structures of Scientific Collaboration is the first study to examine multi-organizational collaboration systematically, drawing on a database of fifty-three collaborations documented for the Center for History of Physics of the American Institute of Physics. By integrating quantitative sociological analyses with detailed case histories, Shrum, Genuth, and Chompalov pioneer a new and truly interdisciplinary method for the study of science and technology.

Scientists undertake multi-organizational collaborations because individual institutions often lack sufficient resources - including the latest technology - to achieve a given research objective. The authors find that collaborative research depends on both technology and bureaucracy; scientists claim to abhor bureaucracy, but most collaborations use it constructively to achieve their goals. The book analyzes the structural elements of collaboration (among them formation, size and duration, organization, technological practices, and participant experiences) and the relationships among them. The authors find that trust, though viewed as positive, is not necessarily associated with successful projects; indeed, the formal structures of bureaucracy reduce the need for high levels of trust - and make possible the independence so valued by participating scientists.
 
 
Other titles in related subjects:
 
Other titles from the same publisher

  
related organisations include:

National Institute of Agricultural Botany
If you are involved in a scientific, conservation or environmental organisation and would like to be listed, please see our NHBS-Xchange information page.