The authors form part of that growing body of reasonable and qualified people who feel unease at the claims of 'scientific consensus' on climate change, and wonder at the policies flowing from those claims. If the science is flawed, plainly the policies are too. Worldwide, billions of Dollars of public money will be mis-spent, unnecessary costs placed on existing industry and new industrial development hampered. Could it really be the case that the 'global warming crisis' is really as much about careers and power as anything else?