To see accurate pricing, please choose your delivery country.
United States
All Shops

British Wildlife

8 issues per year 84 pages per issue Subscription only

British Wildlife is the leading natural history magazine in the UK, providing essential reading for both enthusiast and professional naturalists and wildlife conservationists. Published eight times a year, British Wildlife bridges the gap between popular writing and scientific literature through a combination of long-form articles, regular columns and reports, book reviews and letters.

Subscriptions from £33 per year

Conservation Land Management

4 issues per year 44 pages per issue Subscription only

Conservation Land Management (CLM) is a quarterly magazine that is widely regarded as essential reading for all who are involved in land management for nature conservation, across the British Isles. CLM includes long-form articles, events listings, publication reviews, new product information and updates, reports of conferences and letters.

Subscriptions from £26 per year
Academic & Professional Books  Environmental & Social Studies  Economics, Politics & Policy  Politics, Policy & Planning  Politics, Policy & Planning: General

Should We Control World Population?

By: Diana Coole(Author)
138 pages, no illustrations
Publisher: Polity
A much-needed primer on a controversial topic that we no longer have the luxury to ignore.
Should We Control World Population?
Click to have a closer look
Select version
Average customer review
  • Should We Control World Population? ISBN: 9781509523412 Paperback Jul 2018 Not in stock: Usually dispatched within 6 days
  • Should We Control World Population? ISBN: 9781509523405 Hardback Jul 2018 Not in stock: Usually dispatched within 6 days
Selected version: £14.99
About this book Contents Customer reviews Biography Related titles

About this book

By 2100, the human population may exceed 11 billion. Having recently surpassed 7.5 billion, it has trebled since 1950. Are such numbers sustainable, given a deepening environmental crisis and worldwide aspirations for economic development? Can so many live well? Or should world population be controlled? Resurrecting one of the twentieth-century's most bitterly contested issues, the population question is being debated once again.

In this nuanced and compelling book, leading political theorist Diana Coole examines some of the profound political and ethical questions involved. How definitive are ethical objections to government interference with individuals' reproductive freedom? Is it possible to limit population in a non-coercive way that is consistent with liberal-democratic values? Interweaving erudite original analysis with an accessible overview of the crucial debates, Coole argues that a case can be made for reducing our numbers in ways that are compatible with human rights.

Should We Control World Population? will be essential reading for anyone who wants to get to the heart of one of the most formidable and important questions facing our planet, from concerned citizens to students of politics, sociology, political economy, health studies, gender studies and environmental studies.



Chapter 1 - Should Population be Controlled?
Chapter 2 - The Ethics of Population Control: Reproductive Freedom and Human Rights
Chapter 3 -The Means of Population Governance


Customer Reviews (1)

  • A necessary primer on a controversial topic
    By Leon (NHBS Catalogue Editor) 16 Aug 2018 Written for Paperback

    Speaking of controversial. As mentioned in my previous review of An Essay on the Principle of Population: The 1803 Edition, concerns about human overpopulation go back to at least Malthus, a name that has become synonymous with this topic. How do you tackle this incredibly thorny issue? Malthus believed moral restraint where having children is concerned should be encouraged, which strikes me as starry-eyed and completely out of reach, especially in the individualized societies of today. Simultaneously, we have seen some pretty drastic population control measures with ugly side-effects, such as China’s one-child policy and forced sterilization in India. The cry of eugenics if never far away when this topic is tabled. Can we have any sensible discussion to find a middle ground between utopia and dystopia? This small book does a serious attempt.

    Divided into three parts, Diana Coole first asks whether there actually is a problem, as plenty of people will disavow overpopulation as being a problem to begin with. Covering developmental, environmental, existential, and economical arguments, she concludes that there are good reasons to try and control human population numbers. An example of a developmental argument is that overpopulation is not in the interest of poor countries. An example of an existential argument is whether a world completely dedicated to supporting a huge human population is in the interest of our well-being. Economical arguments on the other hand often end up pro-growth, given the costs of a large, ageing population.

    Out of these four, especially the environmental argument is one that is rapidly becoming impossible to ignore, and I happen to think that overpopulation is the mother-of-all-problems where environmental degradation is concerned. As I argued in my review of The Irresponsible Pursuit of Paradise and is also recognized in this book, a large human population multiplies the impact of our lifestyle. No matter what lifestyle this might be, you always have an impact. I get the impression this is often lost on advocates of sustainable development and green alternatives such as renewable energy. Coole touches on the framework of planetary boundaries developed by Johan Rockström and colleagues. In my opinion, it is important to realise environmental concerns go well beyond the extinction of some cute, furry animals. This is affecting the very fabric of our planetary ecosystem that we as humans also depend on. Ecologists describe this under the umbrella term of ecosystem services (there is a large literature on this, the Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services is but one of many starting points).

    The other two chapters deal with the ethics and the means by which we could actually control population numbers. Coole argues that there are some clear ethical boundaries that cannot be crossed, especially where women’s rights and bodily integrity and autonomy are concerned. It stands to reason that we think forcing an abortion on a woman violates basic human rights. But the other side of the coin, that forcing a woman to continue an unwanted pregnancy by making abortion illegal, is equally problematic, but far less widely accepted. She discusses access to reproductive health services such as family planning and birth control, and whether it is ethical to yield these as tools to steer decision making by couples. Finally, there is the question of the ethics of family size. I found the argument put forth by Sarah Conly’s book One Child: Do We Have a Right to More? very relevant.

    Last but not least, how do we actually go about influencing population numbers? Coole makes a strong argument that in democratic societies we already have a system of mild coercion through laws, taxes etc. to influence people’s behaviour. And often such tools have already been used to influence people’s reproductive decision making through tax reliefs, childcare support, housing schemes etc. used either to encourage or discourage population growth and family size. If we see no problem in governments manipulating consumer behaviour to mitigate environmental degradation, cold logic says we should apply this to human population numbers as well. A tiny problem that Coole also highlights is that many countries where the problem most urgently needs addressing are not democratic countries, but authoritarian regimes or failed states.

    It is only all too easy to fall into extremes when trying to discuss this topic. My own views could safely be called controversial, but this book has forced me to think about more widely applicable and realistic measures. Though the reading might sometimes be a bit heavy on theoretical ethics, Coole immediately convinces that we can no longer ignore the elephant in the room. This slim volume does not provide all the answers, but it is an opening salvo for a much-needed, broader discussion.
    3 of 3 found this helpful - Was this helpful to you? Yes No


Diana Coole is Professor of Political and Social Theory at Birkbeck, University of London

By: Diana Coole(Author)
138 pages, no illustrations
Publisher: Polity
A much-needed primer on a controversial topic that we no longer have the luxury to ignore.
Current promotions
New and Forthcoming BooksNHBS Moth TrapBritish Wildlife MagazineBuyers Guides